KMOHR's PRESIDENT INTERVIEWED ABOUT NEW ZONING REGS
We fully support the valley's workforce housing goals, but housing must be placed where infrastructure can support life safety.
Forcing high-density development into a known bottleneck doesn’t solve a housing crisis—it creates a safety crisis.
A 100-plus unit project at a failing intersection gridlocks the very working people we are trying to house, while simultaneously trapping the residents of Missouri Heights up above during an emergency.
EL JEBEL CROSSING IS BING CHALLENGED BY SAVE MID-VALLEY
For the most current information and how to oppose El Jebel Crossing
Visit: Savemidvalley.org
Applicant: Aspen One
Target Properties: Parcel # 2391-343-18-002 & 2391-343-18-001
Regulatory Status: Standalone Application Under Completeness Review (Post-April 30, 2026 Pre-Application Directive)
The El Jebel Crossing development has entered a critical new phase of the Eagle County review process. Following a formal pre-application directive on April 30, 2026, the developer, Aspen One, abandoned its original conceptual framework and pulled down its active public application. In its place, Aspen One has submitted a brand-new technical package that transitions the project from an isolated 111-unit rental concept to a highly dense, 163-unit residential subdivision across a 20.5-acre site—representing a massive 46% increase in density.
Procedurally, the applicant is now attempting to bypass the standard multi-stage review process by moving forward with a combined Sketch and Preliminary Subdivision Plan concurrently with their 1041 Major Impact Permit and variance requests. This combined path forces the county to evaluate high-level land-use concepts alongside highly granular civil engineering documents simultaneously. Concurrently, Aspen One is pushing a standalone application for large landscape buffering berms, actively seeking a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) to fast-track dirt-moving and grading operations.
Because the 163-unit layout mathematically violates Eagle County's standard safety and design codes, the project cannot proceed without the approval of a formal Variance from Improvement Standards (VIS). Aspen One is actively requesting that the Board of County Commissioners legally waive four critical safety requirements:
Level of Service F Waiver: Requested to legalize the addition of high-density traffic onto a roadway network and an intersection (JW Drive/Highway 82) that is officially documented as operating at a failing capacity (LOS F) during peak hours.
Road Width Reduction Waiver: A request to construct internal subdivision streets that are significantly narrower than the county's standard 30-foot minimum safety requirement, impacting emergency vehicle clearance.
Dead-End Unit Cap Waiver: Eagle County safety code strictly caps dead-end street configurations at a maximum of 25 units to ensure safe turnarounds. Aspen One’s new layout features 28 units on a single dead-end node, violating this fire safety ceiling.
Private Road Maintenance Easement: A request to keep all internal road management, maintenance, and snow removal under a private HOA rather than dedicating the infrastructure to standard county public maintenance.
The post-May 1, 2026, CORA documentation reveals a significant shift in long-term property management. Aspen One intends to subdivide the 20.5-acre parcel into 17 distinct lots. Rather than acting as a singular landlord managing a workforce community under Skico employment leases, the developer is utilizing a fractional "land banking" strategy:
Third-Party Sales: Aspen One plans to sell off individual subdivided lots or townhome parcels to outside public and regional entities (such as CDOT, RFTA, or local fire and police districts) so those independent entities can construct their own employee housing.
Enforcement Fragmentation: While Aspen One intends to maintain control of the master HOA to enforce basic community rules, the transfer of individual lot ownership to third-party partners fragments tenant oversight. This raises serious regulatory questions regarding who polices tenant behavior, lease compliance, and neighborhood integration when units are managed by completely separate corporate and public entities.
Sufficiency and Completeness Review: Eagle County staff is currently reviewing the combined submittal package for technical sufficiency. Because the online application portal has been deactivated during this review, the project is currently in a "socialization" phase among local stakeholders.
Public Hearings: Formal public hearings before the Eagle County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners are anticipated to be scheduled no earlier than September 2026, following a formal determination of application completeness.