Water Sustainability

• Misinterpretation of Study: Applicant water engineers have allegedly misinterpreted the Groundwater Monitoring Study, incorrectly asserting that more intensive development won't negatively impact the Missouri Heights aquifer.

• Cumulative Impact: The letter emphasizes that considering a single property's water use in isolation ignores the collective drain on the aquifer, which is the primary water source for all Missouri Heights residents.

• Foundational Consideration: The BWCD suggests that their recommendations should be a foundational consideration for zoning classifications and permitted uses, and should also be used as a reference for future land use applications in Missouri Heights.

FEEDBACK ON WATER FROM OUR RESIDENTS' SURVEY

Concern about long-term water availability: A significant number of respondents are "Very Concerned" about the long-term availability of water in Missouri Heights.  Several others are "Somewhat Concerned." A few respondents are "Neutral" or "Unconcerned."

Lack of water as a threat to rural character: Lack of Water" is predominantly ranked as a "High" threat to the rural character of Missouri Heights. Some respondents consider it a "Medium" or "Low" threat, or have "No Opinion.

Advocating for water studies: Advocating for Water Studies to monitor and ensure a sustainable water supply" is largely considered "Most Important" as a key issue for KMOHR to focus on. Some respondents consider it "Somewhat important" or "Neutral."

Additional comments related to water: One comment explicitly states, "Water is the most important thing. Things change, while I enjoy the rural character of Missouri heights, I am more concerned about how it’s changing character would effect all the existing residents and future residences access to water." This feedback highlights a strong and widespread concern among residents regarding water availability and its impact on the rural character of Missouri Heights, with a clear desire for KMOHR to prioritize water studies.