The Fields Development
IS BACK!
THE FIELDS is back! Application Posted Referrals Due May 8
IS BACK!
While The Fields Development is not part of Missouri Heights, we share information about this project due to: Increased traffic congestion at the intersections of El Jebel Rd and Hwy 82 and Catherine Store Rd and Hwy 82. A new application has been submitted!
RFRPC (TBD)
BoCC (TBD)
Submit public comment form: Project: The Fields
To watch the meeting live please visit www.ecgtv.com. If you're not planning to participate directly in the meeting, then we highly encourage you to use the streaming link provided above, to avoid bandwidth issues.
All public hearings will have the option of attending in-person or virtually for public comment. Pre-registration for in-person or virtual public comment is not required. Virtual public comment links will be activated on the date and time of the
PLEASE CHECK THE EAGLE COUNTY WEBSITE FOR THE LATEST INFORMATION
NEW APPLICATION SUMMARY
The proposed development at 554 Valley Road, known as "The Fields," involves a significant intensification of land use and necessitates multiple deviations from established County standards. This 19.39-acre project seeks to replace historically irrigated agricultural pastureland with a 41-unit residential subdivision, requiring a rezone from Rural Residential (RR) to Residential Suburban Medium (RSM).
Significant Density Increase: The project would shift the property from a rural designation allowing one single-family unit per two acres to a suburban medium-density district allowing lots as small as 8,000 square feet.
Loss of Agricultural Land: Implementation of the project requires the permanent loss of 14.3 acres of historically irrigated land and the termination of all existing agricultural activities on the site.
Tenant Displacement: To make way for construction, the developer will terminate the leases of current residents living in four existing structures on the property.
The project relies heavily on Variances from Improvement Standards (VIS) because it cannot meet the County’s standard safety and operational requirements:
Failing Intersections: Nearby high-capacity intersections at SH 82/El Jebel Road and SH 82/JW Drive already operate at a Level of Service (LOS) F during peak hours, which is a failing grade by County standards.
Roadway Deviances: Due to a "limited right-of-way," the developer is requesting variances to skip mandatory road standards, including the requirement for 60-foot right-of-way widths, 15-foot lane widths, and detached sidewalks or paths.
Increased Volume: The subdivision is projected to add 389 vehicle trips per day to a corridor that already faces documented speeding and pedestrian safety issues.
Sinkhole Potential: Geotechnical investigations identified a potential risk for ground subsidence (sinkholes) due to the underlying Eagle Valley Evaporite bedrock. While the applicant rates this risk as "low," it is a known hazard in the area.
Wildfire Exposure: Portions of the property are rated as "FireShed High" due to existing conifer and cottonwood trees, requiring mandatory ignition-resistant construction for all new buildings.
Wetland Degradation: While the applicant claims the on-site wetlands are "non-jurisdictional" because they were induced by agricultural irrigation, development will result in the discontinuance of this irrigation, effectively eliminating these existing green features.
While the applicant highlights a $5.07 million public benefit package, the vast majority of this value ($4.32 million) is derived from the projected "affordability gap" of 5.6 units built beyond the minimum requirement. The remaining physical improvements, such as the Valley Road sidewalk and traffic calming measures, are proposed to mitigate the impacts and safety deficiencies introduced by the development itself.
FORMER APPLICATION VERSUS THE NEW APPLICATION
Based on a comparison between the 2026 application materials and the 2020 application, the major differences represent a significant reduction in project scale and a shift in housing density.
The primary differences include:
2020 Application: Proposed up to 135 dwelling units. This included a sketch plan approved in 2016 for 110 units.
2026 Application: Proposes only 41 dwelling units.
Density Change: The gross density has dropped from approximately 7 units per acre (the maximum suggested by the 2018 Mid Valley Area Community Plan ) to 2.1 units per acre in the current proposal.
Arrangement: The 2026 plan features 29 single-family market-rate lots and 12 half-duplex affordable units. The earlier higher-density versions likely required more multi-family or clustered configurations to reach 110–135 units.
Subdivision Strategy: Initially, the affordable units were shown as a single lot containing multiple buildings. Following County feedback, the new application was revised to create six individual duplex lots (Lots 20-25), ensuring only one residential building exists per lot to comply with RSM zoning standards.
Affordable Housing Percentages: While the 2020 application included 54 equivalent affordable units , the 2026 application prioritizes a "Public Benefit" package by providing 188% of the County's required affordable housing (12 units provided vs. 6.38 required).
Monetary Value: The applicant now quantifies the public benefit at over $5 million, which includes the "Affordability Gap" for providing 5.6 units more than required.
Valley Road Sidewalk: The new application commits to building approximately 860 linear feet of new public sidewalk, curb, and gutter along the north side of Valley Road.
Traffic Calming: Unlike prior iterations, the current plan proactively includes two raised pedestrian crosswalks with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB) to address neighbor concerns regarding speeding on Valley Road.
Level of Service (LOS): The 2026 application includes a new formal request for Variances from Improvement Standards regarding the Level of Service at Highway 82 intersections. The applicant noted that the lack of this variance in the prior application was a point of concern for County Commissioners in 2023.
Roadway Standards: The current application seeks variances for Valley Road's width and shoulder type, citing that the narrow, fixed right-of-way makes it impossible to meet standard County suburban collector designs.
Water Conservation: The current plan features a dedicated pressurized raw-water irrigation system using 173 shares of Arlian Ranch Ditch water to eliminate the use of treated potable water for the 7.0 acres of open space.
Tree Preservation: The landscape plan was updated to replace Manchurian Ash trees with American Lindens to protect against the Emerald Ash Borer.
NEW APPLICATION SUBMITTED April, 2026
Watch the November 10 Hearing on ditch company comments: Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission-November 10, 2022
Watch the August 17 Hearing: Board of County Commissioners Special Meeting-Fields PUD Hearing-August 17, 2022 ...to be continued.
The public comment process will remain open. However the County asks you to relate your comment to the standards of approval, in order to have "value" to them. Implicitly....to be read.
Read the Keep Missouri Heights Public Comment submitted to Eagle County. Read about the Straw Poll we conducted to gauge our Supporter's sentiment about The Field's Development.
In the news: Eagle County commissioners skeptical about benefits of The Fields - Aspen Daily News (August 18) El Jebel development seeks rezoning approval from Eagle County - Aspen Times (August 21)
Join the KMOHR mailing list: Send an email message to KeepMOHRural@gmail.com with the subject line: Opt IN.