The Public Record
VIA OPEN RECORDS REQUESTS
THE EL JEBEL CROSSING HEARING SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 5 IS CANCELED - WATCH FOR RESCHEDULING
VIA OPEN RECORDS REQUESTS
Eagle County's Response. January 30, 2026
Eagle County's Response. December 19, 2025
Eagle County's Response. November 9, 2025
ANALYSIS OF THE JANUARY CORA RESPONSE
Why was the 1041 process was applied to this application?
Based on the CORA Response, the 1041 process was applied to the EJ Crossing application primarily because it qualifies as an "Activity of State Interest" under Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S. 24-65.1-10).
Specifically, the project triggered the 1041 permit requirement for the following reasons:
Scale of Development: The proposed project consists of 111 residential units (rental townhomes and apartments), which exceeds the threshold of 10 units.
Infrastructure Extensions: The development contemplates the extension of water and wastewater mains.
Major Extensions: It is classified under submittal requirements for major new domestic water and wastewater treatment systems and major extensions of existing systems.
Application Criteria: The 1041 review process assesses whether the proposal is likely to have significant adverse impacts based on specific permit application approval criteria.
Staff Stance on Waivers: The applicant requested several waivers from the 1041 process (including socioeconomic and environmental impact reports), but County staff recommended denying these waivers, noting that other applications have successfully submitted complete responses to these requirements without extensive reporting.
FONSI Option: The applicant was given the option to request a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), which requires demonstrating that the project is unlikely to have significant adverse impacts.
Public Hearing: As a Residential Suburban Density project requiring a 1041 permit, the application must undergo a public hearing.
Any and all references or connections to ZS-009514-2025 within the El Jebel Crossings file documentation, including submittal of a revised Compliance Statement, Geotechnical Reports, and Recorded Easements.
References and connections to ZS-009514-2025 within the El Jebel Crossings documentation primarily relate to the 1041 Permit Application and its technical submittals, specifically focusing on traffic impacts and compliance.
1041 Permit and Compliance Documentation
Permit Association: ZS-009514-2025 (often referenced alongside or as part of 1041-009568-2025) is the primary file number for the El Jebel Crossing 1041 Permit application.
Revised Compliance Statement: The applicant submitted a response letter on January 7, 2026, addressing Referral V.2 comments for the 1041 permit. This response serves as a revised statement of compliance, specifically addressing concerns from the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and the Eagle County Community Development Team regarding "Activities of State Interest".
Traffic and Infrastructure Compliance: A critical part of the compliance documentation includes the applicant's response to a Variance from Improvement Standards (VIS) for building height and berm length, which is linked to the overall 1041 process.
Geotechnical and Engineering Reports
Engineering Standards: While a standalone document titled "Geotechnical Report" was not explicitly listed in the retrieved folder, the file contains Civil Engineering and Site Plan documents (such as C-1.1 and C-1.3) that address internal access, road widths (24-foot vs. 26-foot discrepancies), and stormwater drainage.
Drainage and Soils: The 1041 pre-application summary mandates that Drainage Standards must be addressed per Section 4-650 of the ECLUR and Chapter 6 of the Engineering Criteria Manual.
Technical Objections: Internal documents and public comments (CORA Analysis) reference technical data from the applicant's Traffic Impact Study (TIS), noting discrepancies in trip generation models (ITE Code 223 vs. 215/221).
Recorded Easements and Right-of-Way
Roadway Easements: The county roadway standards for the project require a minimum right-of-way of 60 feet, which can be established through a dedicated right-of-way or a right-of-way easement.
Irrigation Ditch Easements: The documentation notes the potential existence of irrigation ditches crossing the property, requiring irrigation ditch easements of the average width of the ditch plus twenty feet.
Restricted Access Easements: The updated site plans (C-1.1) identify certain connections as "Gated Emergency Access" only, rather than full-use resident connections, which has been a point of contention in the referral process.
Documents related to selecting and/or using the Affordable Housing ITE 223 to calculate vehicle trips in the traffic report related to EJ Crossing
Impacts on this project RFSD Housing Master Plan has on this project
The documentation for the El Jebel (EJ) Crossing project outlines several key ways the Roaring Fork School District (RFSD) Housing Master Plan and associated regional growth factors impact this development:
Study Omissions: Formal objections and agency comments note that the applicant's Traffic Impact Study (TIS) fails to integrate projected traffic from the planned RFSD housing project.
Intersection Congestion: Roaring Fork Fire Rescue expressed concern that the cumulative effect of the EJ Crossing units, the School District housing, and other area growth will further degrade response times through intersections already considered "tricky" and "congested" during peak hours.
Infrastructure Health: Concerns have been raised by the Town of Basalt and local residents that the TIS analyzes the project "in a vacuum" without accounting for the regional growth contemplated in the School District's plans.
School District Referrals: The Roaring Fork School District was included as a formal referral agency for the project, meaning they are tasked with evaluating how the 111-unit development might impact local school capacity and resources.
Law Enforcement Concerns: Similar to the school district's interest, the Basalt Police Department has flagged that the project's estimated 282 new residents will increase mutual aid costs and service burdens, suggesting a need for financial contributions to offset these impacts.
Workforce Demographic: The documentation characterizes EJ Crossing as a workforce housing project. This aligns with the broader regional goals often seen in local housing master plans to provide year-round occupancy for active commuters.
Zoning and 1041 Triggers: The project is located on land zoned Residential Suburban Medium Density. Because it exceeds 10 units and requires water/wastewater extensions, it triggered the "Activities of State Interest" (1041) permit process, which requires a more rigorous review of its impact on regional plans and services than a standard development.
Notice: This information was prepared using Artificial Intelligence to synthesize and organize public records from published data, CORA responses, and other relevant documents. While this tool assists in identifying patterns and structuring data, users should perform their own independent verification of quotes, dates, and technical data points against the official Eagle County case file before using this information in formal testimony or legal filings.