THE EL JEBEL CROSSING HEARING SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 5 IS CANCELED - WATCH FOR RESCHEDULING
This RFSD Staff Housing Master Plan is intended as an INTERNAL RFSD document to guide future plans. However, the school district referenced it when asked to provide referral agency comments on El Jebel Crossing.
Based on the official records and referral comments for the EJ Crossing application (File Nos. 1041-009568-2025, VIS-009583-2025, and FONZ-009582-2025), the Roaring Fork School District (RFSD) was formally listed as a referral agency.
Their specific technical concerns, as documented in the public record and discussed by local stakeholders, are as follows:
Conflict with RFSD Housing Plan: The district specifically referenced its 2025 Staff Housing Master Plan, identifying its own adjacent land on JW Drive (15.71 acres) as a "High Priority Development Site" for future school workforce housing (estimated at 64 to 229 units)
Infrastructure "Lock Out": The RFSD expressed concern that the EJ Crossing project could consume the remaining finite infrastructure capacity—specifically road volume at the already-failing JW Drive/Highway 82 intersection—effectively "locking out" the district from being able to develop its own prioritized staff housing in the future.
Student Generation & Mitigation: The RFSD referral noted that the 111 units would introduce a significant new student population into the district. While the exact cash-in-lieu dollar amount is typically finalized at the platting stage, the district requires such mitigation to address the increased enrollment without corresponding existing facility funding
Traffic and Safety: The district highlighted that existing intersections, such as JW Drive and Highway 82, are already at Level of Service (LOS) F (failing). They noted that additional traffic from this development would further degrade safety and functionality for school buses and staff commutes
Status of Other Agency Referrals
Roaring Fork Fire Rescue (RFFR): Stated that the current emergency route is "very congested during peak hours" and that the "increased trips generated by new development will impact our response in a timely fashion
Town of Basalt: Expressed "sincere concern" regarding the impact on traffic and the low-functioning intersections, specifically stating they were not supportive of the proposed parking plan or the request for a traffic variance
Basalt Police Department: Estimated the project would generate 10 additional mutual aid service calls annually, costing the town $4,673.70 per year, and requested a financial contribution to offset this cost
Upcoming Hearing Information
The Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission (RFVPC) is scheduled to hold a hearing specifically for the 1041-009568-2025 application (to be re-scheduled), where these referral comments will be a central part of the staff evaluation.
Notice: This information was prepared using Artificial Intelligence to synthesize and organize public records from published data, CORA responses, and other relevant documents. While this tool assists in identifying patterns and structuring data, users should perform their own independent verification of quotes, dates, and technical data points against the official Eagle County case file before using this information in formal testimony or legal filings.